Screener
OMFL vs DFAC
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
OMFL is an alternative ETF, while DFAC is an equity ETF. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and DFAC 0.17%.
- OMFL is an alternative fund, while DFAC is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; DFAC uses active selection.
- DFAC costs 0.12% less per year.
- DFAC is much larger than OMFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $46.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | 12.55% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -23.11% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.