Screener
OMFL vs XLBI
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
Both OMFL and XLBI are alternative ETFs. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and XLBI 0.00%. The main difference: OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; XLBI uses option income.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; XLBI uses option income.
- XLBI costs 0.29% less per year.
- OMFL is much larger than XLBI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | XLBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $7M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -10.63% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.