Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs DFAC

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

DFAC

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

Annual cost

0.17%

Fund size

$46.7B

Key differences

Both OMFS and DFAC are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and DFAC 0.17%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFAC uses active selection.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFAC uses active selection.
  • DFAC costs 0.22% less per year.
  • DFAC is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSDFAC
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.17%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$46.7B
Since20172007
Dividend yield0.90%0.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+31.4%+27.1%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%+20.0%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.571.05
Volatility 1Y18.00%12.55%
Max drawdown-42.50%-23.11%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to OMFS and DFAC