Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs DFUV

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

DFUV

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

Annual cost

0.21%

Fund size

$14.9B

Key differences

Both OMFS and DFUV are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and DFUV 0.21%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFUV uses active selection.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DFUV uses active selection.
  • DFUV costs 0.18% less per year.
  • DFUV is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DFUV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSDFUV
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.21%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$14.9B
Since20171998
Dividend yield0.90%1.36%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+31.4%+34.5%
CAGR 3Y+14.1%+19.3%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.571.04
Volatility 1Y18.00%12.13%
Max drawdown-42.50%-17.60%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to OMFS and DFUV