Screener
OMFS vs FLQS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- OMFS is significantly larger than FLQS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; FLQS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $51M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -42.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and FLQS
Explore further