Screener
OMFS vs PFM
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.13% less per year.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $764M |
| Since | 2017 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 9.62% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and PFM
Explore further