Screener
ONEV vs SPMO
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Key differences
- SPMO costs 0.07% less per year.
- SPMO is significantly larger than ONEV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ONEV is classified as alternative, while SPMO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ONEV follows a multi strategy strategy; SPMO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SPMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONEV | SPMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $501M | $16.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +42.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.35% | 17.45% |
| Max drawdown | -39.72% | -30.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONEV and SPMO
Explore further