Screener
ONEV vs XMLV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- ONEV is classified as alternative, while XMLV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ONEV follows a multi strategy strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ONEV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONEV | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $501M | $750M |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.35% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -39.72% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONEV and XMLV
Explore further