Screener
ONOF vs FDAT
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
Both ONOF and FDAT are fixed income ETFs. ONOF charges 0.39% a year and FDAT 0.78%. The main difference: ONOF follows a active selection strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- ONOF follows a active selection strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- ONOF costs 0.39% less per year.
- ONOF is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ONOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $144M | $36M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 5.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.67% | 10.36% |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -8.20% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.