Screener
ONOF vs MATE
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
ONOF is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. ONOF charges 0.39% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- ONOF is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ONOF follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- ONOF covers North America; MATE covers emerging markets.
- ONOF costs 0.58% less per year.
- ONOF is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $144M | $39M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.67% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.