Screener
ONOF vs QRMI
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
ONOF is a fixed income ETF, while QRMI is an alternative ETF. ONOF charges 0.39% a year and QRMI 0.60%.
- ONOF is a fixed income fund, while QRMI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ONOF follows a active selection strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- ONOF costs 0.21% less per year.
- ONOF is much larger than QRMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ONOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $144M | $16M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 12.22% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.2% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.67% | 6.00% |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.