Screener
OPER vs CGUI
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF vs Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
Key differences
- OPER follows a active selection strategy; CGUI uses index tracking.
- OPER has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPER | CGUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $246M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.26% | 0.74% |
| Max drawdown | -2.33% | -0.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPER and CGUI
Explore further