Screener
OPTZ vs FLQL
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | FLQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.9% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.03% | 12.99% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and FLQL
Explore further