Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

OPTZ vs IWO

Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

OPTZ

Optimize Strategy Index ETF

Optimize Financial Inc

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$242M

IWO

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$13.9B

Key differences

  • IWO is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

OPTZIWO
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.24%
Fund size (AUM)$242M$13.9B
Since20242000
Dividend yield0.50%0.42%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+59.6%+43.1%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.75
Volatility 1Y18.13%21.41%
Max drawdown-25.75%-42.01%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to OPTZ and IWO