Screener
OPTZ vs TMFC
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- OPTZ costs 0.25% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.13% | 13.69% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and TMFC
Explore further