Screener
ORBX vs ARKF
Global X Space Tech ETF vs ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.25% less per year.
- ARKF is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ORBX follows a index tracking strategy; ARKF uses active selection.
- ARKF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | ARKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $828M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 33.17% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -78.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and ARKF
Explore further