Screener
ORBX vs CEFA
Global X Space Tech ETF vs Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- CEFA costs 0.15% less per year.
- CEFA is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ORBX covers north america markets; CEFA covers global.
- CEFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $46M |
| Since | 2026 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.41% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -31.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and CEFA
Explore further