Screener
ORBX vs CLOU
Global X Space Tech ETF vs Global X Cloud Computing ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.18% less per year.
- CLOU is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | CLOU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $220M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 27.05% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -53.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and CLOU
Explore further