Screener
ORBX vs IGM
Global X Space Tech ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.11% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and IGM
Explore further