Screener
ORBX vs MIDE
Global X Space Tech ETF vs Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF
Key differences
- MIDE costs 0.35% less per year.
- ORBX is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MIDE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | MIDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $4M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.01% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -24.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and MIDE
Explore further