Screener
ORBX vs SOCL
Global X Space Tech ETF vs Global X Social Media ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.15% less per year.
- SOCL is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SOCL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | SOCL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $92M |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -1.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.95% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -68.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and SOCL
Explore further