Screener
OSEA vs EFFE
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.14% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than EFFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA covers global markets; EFFE covers emerging markets.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; EFFE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | EFFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $130M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 19.37% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -13.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and EFFE
Explore further