Screener
OSEA vs FENI
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.27% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA covers global markets; FENI covers europe.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 15.57% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -14.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and FENI
Explore further