Screener
OSEA vs MEDI
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Harbor Health Care ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.25% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than MEDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA covers global markets; MEDI covers north america.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; MEDI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEDI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | MEDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $28M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -19.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and MEDI
Explore further