Screener
OSEA vs PY
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.40% less per year.
- OSEA covers global markets; PY covers north america.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $212M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and PY
Explore further