Screener
OSEA vs SHUS
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.24% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA is classified as equity, while SHUS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OSEA covers global markets; SHUS covers north america.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; SHUS uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, SHUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | SHUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $24M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 10.18% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -14.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and SHUS
Explore further