Screener
OUSA vs DGRO
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.40% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than OUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $39.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 2.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -35.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and DGRO
Explore further