Screener
OUSA vs DNL
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Growth Fund
Key differences
- DNL costs 0.06% less per year.
- OUSA covers north america markets; DNL covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, OUSA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DNL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | DNL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $467M |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -34.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and DNL
Explore further