Screener
OUSA vs QSML
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
Key differences
- QSML costs 0.10% less per year.
- OUSA is significantly larger than QSML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSA | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $751M | $11M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 0.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -33.12% | -28.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSA and QSML
Explore further