Screener
OUSM vs QFHD
ALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- OUSM is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OUSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OUSM | QFHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $904M | $0.5M |
| Since | 2016 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -5.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OUSM and QFHD
Explore further