Screener
OWNS vs CGSD
Impact Shares Affordable Housing MBS ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD is significantly larger than OWNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OWNS follows a index tracking strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGSD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OWNS | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.57% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OWNS and CGSD
Explore further