Screener
OWNS vs IMTG
Impact Shares Affordable Housing MBS ETF vs Invesco Agency MBS ETF
Key differences
- IMTG costs 0.08% less per year.
- OWNS is significantly larger than IMTG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OWNS follows a index tracking strategy; IMTG uses active selection.
- OWNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OWNS | IMTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $102M | $15M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.57% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -2.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OWNS and IMTG
Explore further