Screener
PABD vs CRBN
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI World ex USA ETF vs iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- PABD costs 0.08% less per year.
- CRBN is significantly larger than PABD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRBN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PABD | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $323M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.1% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 13.09% |
| Max drawdown | -13.37% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PABD and CRBN
Explore further