Screener
PABU vs EMXF
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Key differences
- PABU costs 0.06% less per year.
- PABU is significantly larger than EMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PABU covers north america markets; EMXF covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PABU | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $148M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 3.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -20.84% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PABU and EMXF
Explore further