Screener
PABU vs NZAC
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
Key differences
- PABU is significantly larger than NZAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PABU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NZAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PABU | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $188M |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 12.95% |
| Max drawdown | -20.84% | -33.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PABU and NZAC
Explore further