Screener
PABU vs SUSL
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
Key differences
- PABU follows a index tracking strategy; SUSL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SUSL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PABU | SUSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 13.10% |
| Max drawdown | -20.84% | -34.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PABU and SUSL
Explore further