Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PALL vs SGOL

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF vs abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

PALL

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$754M

SGOL

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.17%

Fund size

$7.7B

Key differences

Both PALL and SGOL are commodity ETFs. PALL charges 0.60% a year and SGOL 0.17%. The main difference: SGOL costs 0.43% less per year.

  • SGOL costs 0.43% less per year.
  • SGOL is much larger than PALL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SGOL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

PALLSGOL
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.17%
Fund size (AUM)$754M$7.7B
Since20102009
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classcommoditycommodity
Region
Strategy
CAGR 1Y+21.9%+27.8%
CAGR 3Y-4.0%+29.8%
CAGR 5Y-15.7%+17.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.011.24
Volatility 1Y50.61%26.58%
Max drawdown-73.63%-21.56%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to PALL and SGOL