Screener
PAPI vs CGIC
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- PAPI costs 0.25% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than PAPI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAPI is classified as alternative, while CGIC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PAPI follows a option income strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAPI | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $367M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 7.48% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.81% | 15.05% |
| Max drawdown | -14.27% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAPI and CGIC
Explore further