Screener
PAVE vs BKCH
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- PAVE is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $314M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.91% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and BKCH
Explore further