Screener
PBD vs CGGR
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and CGGR
Explore further