Screener
PBJ vs QQQM
Invesco Food & Beverage ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQQM costs 0.46% less per year.
- QQQM is significantly larger than PBJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QQQM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBJ | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $82.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.4% | +44.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.47% | 16.06% |
| Max drawdown | -28.49% | -35.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBJ and QQQM
Explore further