Screener
PBOT vs AIQ
Pictet AI & Automation ETF vs Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Key differences
- PBOT costs 0.67% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than PBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBOT follows a active selection strategy; AIQ uses index tracking.
- AIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBOT | AIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $8.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +63.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +37.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.80% |
| Max drawdown | -15.78% | -44.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBOT and AIQ
Explore further