Screener
PBUS vs RFG
Invesco MSCI USA ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- PBUS costs 0.31% less per year.
- PBUS is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PBUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBUS | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $329M |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | 18.50% |
| Max drawdown | -33.15% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBUS and RFG
Explore further