Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PBW vs OIH

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Oil Services ETF

PBW

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$447M

OIH

VanEck Oil Services ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$2.5B

Key differences

  • OIH costs 0.29% less per year.
  • OIH is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, OIH has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

PBWOIH
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$447M$2.5B
Since20052011
Dividend yield0.71%1.09%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+159.6%+100.2%
CAGR 3Y+9.9%+19.9%
CAGR 5Y-8.4%+16.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.350.63
Volatility 1Y40.43%29.55%
Max drawdown-89.06%-89.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PBW and OIH