Screener
PCLO vs ICLO
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF vs Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
Key differences
- ICLO costs 0.10% less per year.
- ICLO is significantly larger than PCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCLO follows a index tracking strategy; ICLO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCLO | ICLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $448M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.32% | 5.26% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.2% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.90% | 1.39% |
| Max drawdown | -0.76% | -3.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCLO and ICLO
Explore further