Screener
PCLO vs VSHY
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF vs Virtus Newfleet Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- PCLO costs 0.10% less per year.
- PCLO follows a index tracking strategy; VSHY uses active selection.
- VSHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCLO | VSHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.32% | 6.45% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.2% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.90% | 3.41% |
| Max drawdown | -0.76% | -14.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCLO and VSHY
Explore further