Screener
PCRB vs BASG
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- PCRB costs 0.25% less per year.
- BASG is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCRB is classified as fixed income, while BASG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PCRB covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- PCRB follows a index tracking strategy; BASG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $467M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.80% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCRB and BASG
Explore further