Screener
PCRB vs NUSA
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- NUSA costs 0.22% less per year.
- NUSA is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | NUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 1.85% |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -9.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCRB and NUSA
Explore further