Screener
PCRB vs PULS
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- PULS costs 0.21% less per year.
- PULS is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCRB follows a index tracking strategy; PULS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PULS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PULS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $15.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | 5.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.2% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 3.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.77% | 0.42% |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -5.85% |
Similar to PCRB and PULS
Explore further