Screener
PCRB vs SUSC
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSC costs 0.18% less per year.
- SUSC is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SUSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | SUSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | 4.45% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -22.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCRB and SUSC
Explore further